Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170929
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '18 at 09:17
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 75 1-Core 119 2-Core 235 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 456 8-Core 908 80% 682 Pts	64-Core 1,259 78% 1,259 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B 49,289 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) 2GB CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Lighting 25.5 Reflection 30.7 Parallax 32.8 21% 29.6 fps	MRender 29.3 Gravity 24 Splatting 32.4 24% 28.6 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 6,967 User benchmarks, average bench 225% 815GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXY7501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 860 1132 1187 1184 1181 1182 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	246% Outstanding	Read 1,876 Write 1,528 Mixed 935 SusWrite 1,121 305% 1,365 MB/s	4K Read 47.4 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 57.4 205% 72.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1039 DQ Write 727 DQ Mixed 877 656% 881 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 246% Great: 294%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 440GB free Firmware: ST6OA3AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 90 89 90 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 89.4 Write 81.1 Mixed 46.3 SusWrite 89 56% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 171 177 180 175 181 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Read 108 Write 147 Mixed 62.8 SusWrite 176 90% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.6 210% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 90%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 593GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 39 39 39 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 37 Write 35 Mixed 28.4 SusWrite 38.3 47% 34.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 43%
Maxtor Basics Desktop 750GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 576GB free, PID 7410 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 14.5 Mixed 26.9 SusWrite 37.3 38% 28.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GB 810 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	MC Read 31.5 MC Write 29.2 MC Mixed 27.5 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 22.1 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 25.4 76% 26.7 GB/s	Latency 90.3 44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)