ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus GL503VM

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus GL503VM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GL503VM
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171225
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '18 at 03:45
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 90 1-Core 109 2-Core 222 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 599 58% 479 Pts	64-Core 590 36% 590 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 155E) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 382.98 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.6% Below average	Lighting 32.5 Reflection 53.2 Parallax 46.5 26% 44.1 fps	MRender 38.9 Gravity 49.3 Splatting 59.4 42% 49.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Thnsn5128gpu7 TOSHIBA 128GB 3,510 User benchmarks, average bench 139% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 57XA4104 SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 572 569 487 484 486 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	99.7% Outstanding	Read 706 Write 542 Mixed 538 SusWrite 510 129% 574 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 44.4 4K Mixed 38.9 121% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 34.9 DQ Write 63.1 DQ Mixed 253 134% 117 MB/s
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 99.7% Great: 176%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 931GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 118 126 128 126 122 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 107 Write 71.5 Mixed 108 SusWrite 117 75% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 2 362% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB 144,145 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	42.5% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 11.4 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.4 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GL503VM Builds (Compare 550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 27%

Raft

System: Asus GL503VM

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	483x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	67x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	550x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	96x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	92x
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples	60x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 40%, 36,753 samples	212x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	62x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	50x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback