PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME Z270-A (all builds) |
Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161011 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Sep 02 '18 at 01:03 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 17% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
82.9%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 399.7
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 511 310 131 280 99 MB/s
|
96.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
375GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 420 429 438 438 437 MB/s
|
98.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
71.8%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 3,691x |
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples | 1,437x |
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 612x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 1,144x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 864x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 810x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $685 |