PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 96.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Studio XPS 8000 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0X231R |
Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20091221 |
Uptime | 3.7 Days |
Run Date | Sep 01 '18 at 23:46 |
Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X3470
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
71.4%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Zotac(19DA 1451) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
96.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC4D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 111 114 118 120 121 MB/s
|
79.8%
Very good
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 64GB
55GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.2 3.7 3.9 3.7 4 MB/s
|
6.46%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 118x |
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 51x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples | 21x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 13x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $385 |