Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 49% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161213
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '18 at 18:09
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	7%
CPU Throttled	49%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Memory 75.9 1-Core 44.7 2-Core 88.9 46% 69.8 Pts	4-Core 163 8-Core 247 25% 205 Pts	64-Core 245 15% 245 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Clevo(1558 850A) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9882 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	19.9% Very poor	Lighting 19.7 Reflection 23 Parallax 34.4 16% 25.7 fps	MRender 27.6 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 34 27% 33.1 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SM2280S3G2240G 240GB 3,414 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM01.V SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 155 197 260 114 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 387 Write 324 Mixed 283 SusWrite 171 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 33.5 4K Mixed 22.1 62% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 310 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 120 144% 251 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 97%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB 40,079 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 344GB free Firmware: 0004SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 130 131 133 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 131 Write 131 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 130 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 1x8GB 515 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 12 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 13.3 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 88.4 45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	342x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	72x
Core i3-7100HIntelBench 56%, 141 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	246x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	107x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	64x

SSD
MX300 SATA M.2 275GBCrucial $42Bench 80%, 16,792 samples	22x
MX300 SATA M.2 525GBCrucial $140Bench 85%, 20,154 samples	17x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	14x

RAM
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,974 samples	27x
GKE800SO102408-2400 2x8GBHynixBench 71%, 801 samples	23x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16