Asrock X99M Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '18 at 13:18
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 95.5
1-Core 124
2-Core 249
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 743
75% 608 Pts
64-Core 952
59% 952 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Asus(1043 8623) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 144
Parallax 137
105% 137 fps
MRender 98.4
Gravity 125
Splatting 107
90% 110 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 100%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 488
Write 470
Mixed 382
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 50.5
171% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 271
206% 277 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
86GB free
Firmware: MU02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 497
Write 424
Mixed 338
93% 420 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 38.5
137% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 202
166% 236 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 108%
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
131GB free
Firmware: MU01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 495
Write 420
Mixed 335
92% 417 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 38.7
136% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 202
166% 237 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
366GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 174
Write 156
Mixed 91.2
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 108%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 154
Write 144
Mixed 79.5
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 158
Write 141
Mixed 79.8
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 92.5
Mixed 65.3
64% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 87%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
843GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 125
Write 118
Mixed 80.3
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 52.5
MC Mixed 40.3
129% 45.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 20.3
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 55.5
72% 55.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 116%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $495
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback