Asus PRIME H370-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H370-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '18 at 09:06
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 127
2-Core 247
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 719
76% 607 Pts
64-Core 723
45% 723 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 93%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Lighting 35
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 31.8
28% 30.8 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 32.2
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 204 213 196 195 201 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 885
Write 439
Mixed 332
SusWrite 206
102% 465 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 47.8
167% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 661
DQ Write 516
DQ Mixed 319
312% 499 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 126%
Great: 144%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 250GB-$55
120GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 202 201 193 196 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 301
Mixed 160
SusWrite 206
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 42.4
156% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 240
201% 294 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 104%
Softperfect Virtual Disk 1GB
1GB free
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 9,418
Write 8,970
Mixed 8,995
2,039% 9,128 MB/s
4K Read 896
4K Write 671
4K Mixed 750
2,673% 772 MB/s
DQ Read 2,144
DQ Write 1,829
DQ Mixed 1,917
1,455% 1,964 MB/s
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 165 168 169 168 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 155
Mixed 99.2
SusWrite 165
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 97%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 121 122 122 121 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 145
Write 131
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 119
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 101%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
81GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 70 72 72 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 86
Write 89.3
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 70.8
57% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FBD 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
90% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 25.3
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 26.4
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H370-PLUS Builds (Compare 655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H370-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $471
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback