Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34 45,308 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	60% Above average	Memory 85.8 1-Core 83.4 2-Core 143 64% 104 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 201 27% 200 Pts	64-Core 203 13% 203 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000M 3,227 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Dell(1028 14A3) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 327.62 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	5.73% Terrible	Lighting 6.73 Reflection 7.85 Parallax 5.53 6% 6.7 fps	MRender 8.29 Gravity 7.13 Splatting 7.39 6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.73% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 364 369 264 173 118 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 384 Write 413 Mixed 307 SusWrite 263 77% 342 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 27.7 93% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 180 156% 225 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB 6,386 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.6 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	227x
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	170x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	85x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	16x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 45%, 885 samples	12x

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $113

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16