Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics6.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive21.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '18 at 09:32
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9500 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Memory 45.2
1-Core 61.8
2-Core 70.2
37% 59.1 Pts
4-Core 76.2
8-Core 108
12% 92.1 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.84% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 12.4
7% 10.6 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 9.67
Splatting 7.43
6% 7.29 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.84%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 54 64 89 82 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.2% Poor
Read 84.2
Write 179
Mixed 132
SusWrite 81.6
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 9.7
36% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 35.4
DQ Write 51.4
DQ Mixed 38.3
30% 41.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 55%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
209GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 180 196 193 191 270 MB/s
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.7% Above average
Read 266
Write 172
Mixed 201
SusWrite 209
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 16
75% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 124
113% 173 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 100%
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$31
86GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 60 82 61 62 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 397
Write 311
Mixed 250
SusWrite 91
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 15
63% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 152
113% 149 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4G2400CL16 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
21.2% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 8.4
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $398
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback