Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	. .
Motherboard	http://www.abit.com.tw/ IP35-E(Intel P35+ICH9R)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 6 GB
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080910
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 31 '18 at 02:30
Run Duration	7019 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual E2180-$130 7,312 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.05 GHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Memory 63.7 1-Core 23.6 2-Core 46.1 32% 44.5 Pts	4-Core 45.9 8-Core 46.1 6% 46 Pts	64-Core 46.6 3% 46.6 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1650 725 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E020) 256MB Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	0.52% Terrible	Lighting 0.97 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.96 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.52% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB 13,767 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM05H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 135 158 132 151 185 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.4% Average	Read 210 Write 191 Mixed 155 SusWrite 147 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 19 70% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 22 DQ Write 49.5 DQ Mixed 22.8 21% 31.4 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16