PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 18.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140911 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 29 '18 at 23:24 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
65.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
35.6%
Below average
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 17 14 16 33 16 MB/s
|
18.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Hitachi HDS724030ALE640 3TB
633GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 18 20 20 34 17 MB/s
|
19.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
883GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 106 90 121 137 105 MB/s
|
68.9%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 508x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 325x |
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 185x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 139x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 90x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $128 |