| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| System | Dell Latitude E6400 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0K672N |
| Memory | 1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090213 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 29 '18 at 20:17 |
| Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
| Run User | THA-User |
| Background CPU | 37% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
41.2%
Average
|
42% 64.4 Pts
|
11% 82.2 Pts
|
5% 83.3 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 342.0
|
14.7%
Very poor
|
13% 18.6 fps
|
17% 21.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Momentus Thin 7200 2.5" 320GB-$29
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 51 62 68 68 74 MB/s
|
29.6%
Poor
|
43% 57.9 MB/s
|
113% 0.7 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
|
17%
Very poor
|
15% 5.2 GB/s
|
14% 5.03 GB/s
|
38% 104 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Latitude E6400 Builds (Compare 58 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Latitude E6400
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples | 14x |
| Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples | 13x |
| Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples | 11x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro NVS 160MNvidiaBench 1%, 1,458 samples | 52x |
| Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples | 5x |
| NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M(pe64)Bench 0%, 1 sample | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $42 |