Lenovo 2756BR9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2756BR9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '18 at 16:21
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 81.9
1-Core 85.6
2-Core 133
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 206
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.89
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 10% Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 75 69 88 100 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 79.8
Write 92.4
Mixed 51
SusWrite 81.4
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B1G73BH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 830B NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG 830B NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.1% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback