HP Pavilion Desktop 560-p0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop 560-p0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 828A
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateAug 27 '18 at 21:46
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$156
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 199
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 368
50% 369 Pts
64-Core 372
25% 372 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 77%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S-128G-1006 128GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3511006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 170 172 170 171 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 441
Write 295
Mixed 188
SusWrite 174
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 25.7
109% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 185
158% 234 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34
67GB free
Firmware: HPH3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 99 100 98 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 103
Write 100
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 98.7
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 09D5 16GB
2133, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.1% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 21.9
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 23.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Pavilion Desktop 560-p0xx Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: HP Pavilion Desktop 560-p0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $365
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $299Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback