Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 27 '18 at 18:33
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 152
2-Core 216
91% 155 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 838
79% 657 Pts
64-Core 840
52% 840 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 179
Parallax 165
135% 170 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 166
Splatting 122
109% 134 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 942 585 298 298 298 298 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2,054
Write 1,311
Mixed 597
SusWrite 453
243% 1,104 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 57.8
262% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,054
DQ Write 1,124
DQ Mixed 686
627% 955 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 237%
Great: 236%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
330GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 454 474 483 482 482 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 488
Mixed 463
SusWrite 461
108% 481 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 62.8
212% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 359
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
206GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 487 488 488 488 488 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 488
Mixed 360
SusWrite 487
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 47.5
173% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 171
176% 288 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 119%
Great: 116%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$30
128GB free
Firmware: 0204 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 200 179 184 188 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 389
Write 254
Mixed 247
SusWrite 192
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 13.5
63% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 23.3
44% 88 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 223%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 71 73 73 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 120
Write 113
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 71.4
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
654GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 111 113 113 112 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 111
72% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 84%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
532GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 95 96 97 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 94
Write 89.5
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 95.1
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 88%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 133 134 136 137 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 144
Write 137
Mixed 103
SusWrite 134
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 100%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 82.5
Write 21.2
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 20.5
36% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
30% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 28.6
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 40.2
SC Mixed 28.9
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 54.8
73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $992
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback