Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	Memory 51.3 1-Core 18.6 2-Core 24.1 24% 31.3 Pts	4-Core 38.6 8-Core 39.5 5% 39 Pts	64-Core 36.7 2% 36.7 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 908D) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.41% Terrible	Lighting 1.93 Reflection 1.69 Parallax 1.34 2% 1.66 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.29 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.41% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK3259GSXP 320GB-$50 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 258GB free (System drive) Firmware: GT00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 15 12 19 38 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 38 Write 16 Mixed 18 SusWrite 24.1 18% 24 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.2 61% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 48%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power32G 32GB 295 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 29GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.5 2.7 6 7.2 6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	4.05% Terrible	Read 17.5 Write 20.5 Mixed 7.5 SusWrite 5.1 16% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.05% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GB 18,713 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1334 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 5 12% 4.3 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 1.9 5% 1.9 GB/s	Latency 156 26% 156 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16