HP Pavilion Desktop 560-p0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop 560-p0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 828A
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 26 '18 at 22:46
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-6400-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
64.8% Good
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 191
68% 144 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 366
50% 366 Pts
64-Core 368
25% 368 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 67%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S-128G-1006 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3511006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 169 169 171 171 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 430
Write 226
Mixed 191
SusWrite 175
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 29.5
112% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 194
166% 245 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
53GB free
Firmware: HPH3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 102 103 101 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 97.7
Write 104
Mixed 66
SusWrite 102
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 09D5 16GB
2133, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.3% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 22
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 22.3
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Pavilion Desktop 560-p0xx Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: HP Pavilion Desktop 560-p0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $349
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback