Gigabyte GA-H310M DS2

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M DS2 (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 26 '18 at 11:23
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55 15,354 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 118 2-Core 226 83% 145 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 325 44% 325 Pts	64-Core 333 21% 333 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610 6,108 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6170 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	3.79% Terrible	Lighting 3.57 Reflection 5.46 Parallax 3.81 3% 4.28 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 3.43 Splatting 9.65 6% 6.33 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.79% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE3000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 70 75 78 81 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 305 Write 52.1 Mixed 64.6 SusWrite 76.1 27% 125 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 31.7 4K Mixed 13.9 66% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 21.7 DQ Write 11.4 DQ Mixed 4.7 7% 12.6 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 55%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power8G 8GB 1,859 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.7 3.3 3.2 3.4 3.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	2.67% Terrible	Read 11.2 Write 2.8 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 3.4 5% 4.78 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 5% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.67% Great: 7%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 32GB 792 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 8GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 6.7 11 10 19 18 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 39.4 Write 9.5 Mixed 23 SusWrite 16 26% 22 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.9 65% 2 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905665-014.A00G 1x4GB 440 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	41.3% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 10.9 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 13.2 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M DS2 Builds (Compare 766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M DS2

CPU
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	223x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	204x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	61x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	115x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	48x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	49x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	37x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	32x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	19x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	12x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16