Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9

Performance Results


Gaming 114% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 121% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 (all builds)
Memory	59.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171228
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 26 '18 at 02:36
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$462 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% , 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Memory 81.7 1-Core 127 2-Core 254 85% 154 Pts	4-Core 507 8-Core 926 86% 716 Pts	64-Core 1,716 106% 1,716 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	125% Outstanding	Lighting 169 Reflection 178 Parallax 194 138% 180 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 184 Splatting 127 117% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 414GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1140 1139 1135 1162 1127 1120 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	261% Outstanding	Read 1,773 Write 1,504 Mixed 817 SusWrite 1,137 292% 1,308 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 174 4K Mixed 68.6 246% 95.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,070 DQ Write 956 DQ Mixed 944 727% 990 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 261% Great: 353%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 818GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 161 178 185 180 181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 197 Write 156 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 177 102% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 107%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 127 132 134 131 130 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Read 132 Write 127 Mixed 85.5 SusWrite 131 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 100%
Hitachi HUS726040ALA610 4TB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3TB free Firmware: T962 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 172 173 175 160 173 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 187 Mixed 72.2 SusWrite 171 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.3 181% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 109%
Hitachi HUS726040ALA610 4TB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2.5TB free Firmware: T962 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 169 173 173 171 174 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	99.1% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 175 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 172 107% 146 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.3 185% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 109%
Hitachi HUS726040ALA610 4TB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3TB free Firmware: T962 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 178 180 182 181 179 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 193 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 180 118% 162 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.5 206% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 142 140 147 139 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	78% Very good	Read 129 Write 143 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 143 83% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 195% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 109%
WD WD8001FFWX-68J1UN0 8TB 379 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 176 175 174 170 177 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 164 Mixed 71 SusWrite 174 105% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.6 216% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x8GB 4,255 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	MC Read 34.9 MC Write 63.5 MC Mixed 35.9 128% 44.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 9.9 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 110%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 - $500

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $462Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	67x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	57x
Core i9-7920XIntel $250Bench 82%, 5,430 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	62x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	32x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	18x

SSD
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	21x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	13x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	10x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	60x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	27x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,600

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16