Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	68.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3 (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920x1200x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171108
Uptime	4.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 26 '18 at 01:16
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 79.2 1-Core 83.2 2-Core 213 70% 125 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 666 60% 503 Pts	64-Core 595 37% 595 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	68.8% Good	Lighting 86.1 Reflection 103 Parallax 85.5 70% 91.4 fps	MRender 81.9 Gravity 77.9 Splatting 82.1 66% 80.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$69 11,475 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: E7FM04.C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 832 Write 929 Mixed 688 182% 816 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 39.4 4K Mixed 30.7 96% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 76.6 DQ Mixed 86.9 67% 91.4 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 185%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 159GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 137 133 140 137 126 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	78% Very good	Read 140 Write 118 Mixed 30 SusWrite 131 76% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 103%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 499GB 731 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 184GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 142 135 146 149 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Read 148 Write 132 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 141 83% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42 66,222 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	65.5% Good	MC Read 26 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 20.1 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 19.1 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 81.9 49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	349x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	202x
Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	199x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	197x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	152x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	131x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	57x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	33x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	31x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	60x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	39x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $383

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16