Asus P7P55D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111020
Uptime13.3 Days
Run DateAug 25 '18 at 17:47
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-750-$90
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 131
61% 96 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 208
27% 198 Pts
64-Core 247
17% 247 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.8.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27% Poor
Lighting 108
Reflection 72.2
Parallax 141
28% 107 fps
MRender 53.8
Gravity 104
Splatting 73.9
27% 77.1 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 27%
Great: 42%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$140
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 227 227 233 235 235 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65% Good
Read 226
Write 205
Mixed 187
SusWrite 228
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 32.9
106% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 197
147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 65%
Great: 133%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$65
655GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 93 94 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 88.7
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 94
62% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 76%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 2096
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
2.39% Terrible
Read 7
Write 2.7
Mixed 3
SusWrite 3.6
5% 4.07 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.39%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
26.2% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7.9
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 50%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P7P55D Builds (Compare 5,192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D - $212

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $542
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback