Lenovo 4284W85

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemLenovo 4284W85  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4284W85
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '18 at 14:52
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-2860QM-$469
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 67
2-Core 126
58% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 336
33% 263 Pts
64-Core 341
23% 341 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000M
Legend(17AA 21D1) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
5.33% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 7.35
Parallax 1.94
5% 5.13 fps
MRender 8.24
Gravity 6.97
Splatting 7.35
6% 7.52 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.33%
Great: 6%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 mSATA 500GB-$148
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 242 248 244 233 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.7% Good
Read 238
Write 243
Mixed 226
SusWrite 237
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 29.8
102% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 169
135% 189 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.9% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback