Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.57% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateAug 24 '18 at 19:35
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD FX-6300-$88
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
42.5% Average
1-Core 68.6
2-Core 144
49% 106 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 328
37% 285 Pts
64-Core 323
22% 323 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
9.57% Terrible
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 28.8
8% 24.8 fps
MRender 18.3
Gravity 31
Splatting 24.6
11% 24.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.57%
Great: 11%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$130
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 239 254 260 262 265 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 409
Write 392
Mixed 249
SusWrite 261
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 41
137% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 40.4
DQ Write 97.5
DQ Mixed 51.6
44% 63.2 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 116%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
742GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 76 76 77 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 82.6
Write 83.5
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 75.7
55% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
249GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 113 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 141
Write 108
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 113
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 83.2
Write 55.8
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 57.6
45% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown RMB2GE484CA5-13HC Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX RMB2GE484CA5-13HC 8GB
667, 800, 667 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.6% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 9.8
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 34%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,623 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $697
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback