Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateAug 24 '18 at 19:35
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 68.6
2-Core 144
61% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 328
37% 285 Pts
64-Core 323
22% 323 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
8.14% Terrible
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 28.8
7% 24.8 fps
MRender 18.3
Gravity 31
Splatting 24.6
8% 24.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.14%
Great: 9%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$75
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 239 254 260 262 265 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 409
Write 392
Mixed 249
SusWrite 261
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 41
137% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 40.4
DQ Write 97.5
DQ Mixed 51.6
44% 63.2 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 116%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
742GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 76 76 77 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 82.6
Write 83.5
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 75.7
55% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
249GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 113 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 141
Write 108
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 113
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 83.2
Write 55.8
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 57.6
45% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown RMB2GE484CA5-13HC Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX RMB2GE484CA5-13HC 8GB
667, 800, 667 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.6% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 9.8
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $572
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $192Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $315Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $47
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback