Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 115% UFO	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Extreme
Intel Core i7-8850H 8,461 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	1-Core 127 2-Core 221 84% 174 Pts	4-Core 487 8-Core 784 81% 635 Pts	64-Core 944 63% 944 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 88%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia Quadro P2000 1,607 User benchmarks, average bench 28% HP(103C 842A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.76 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	29.9% Poor	Lighting 124 Reflection 72.7 Parallax 109 33% 102 fps	MRender 69.3 Gravity 112 Splatting 86.7 30% 89.2 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 30%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 141,042 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 842A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5018 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	6.36% Terrible	Lighting 23.5 Reflection 29.5 Parallax 24.9 6% 26 fps	MRender 23.9 Gravity 21.1 Splatting 35.9 6% 27 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.36% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$106 15,813 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 311 286 297 281 273 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	149% Outstanding	Read 1,552 Write 342 Mixed 350 SusWrite 296 138% 635 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 98.2 4K Mixed 40.7 147% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 608 DQ Write 461 DQ Mixed 349 311% 472 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 213%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 9,733 User benchmarks, average bench 274% 954GB free Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1654 1656 1629 1592 1523 1542 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	287% Outstanding	Read 1,791 Write 1,413 Mixed 852 SusWrite 1,599 317% 1,414 MB/s	4K Read 47 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 64.8 215% 75.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1239 DQ Write 1,046 DQ Mixed 1,080 826% 1,122 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 287% Great: 365%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB 24,015 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 73GB free Firmware: 2BC10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 49 52 50 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Read 29.8 Write 50 Mixed 39.1 SusWrite 51.7 32% 42.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH M471A2K43CB1-CRC 48GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	78.1% Very good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 30.5 MC Mixed 24.4 78% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 33 SC Mixed 25.5 73% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 62%

Destroyer

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 6%, 141,042 samples	323x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 28%, 1,607 samples	271x
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 20%, 1,451 samples	140x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 212%, 5,694 samples	265x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $106Bench 143%, 15,813 samples	93x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 5,837 samples	56x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 6,125 samples	97x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 45%, 16,117 samples	71x
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 3,361 samples	40x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613	SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24