Supermicro H8DM8-2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSupermicro H8DM8-2  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H8DM8-2
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '18 at 08:38
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Six-Core AMD Opteron 2419 EE
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
42.3% Average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 26.7
2-Core 53.5
34% 48.5 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 212
19% 159 Pts
64-Core 301
19% 301 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 290
Nvidia(10DE 0493) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 337.88
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
0.57% Terrible
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 1.08
Parallax 0.34
1% 0.73 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.65
0% 0.55 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.57%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mb0500eb NCR 500GB
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPG2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 12 17 16 20 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.32% Terrible
Read 16.8
Write 11.3
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 15.7
11% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 9.32%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x1GB
6 of 16 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 4.7
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 4.6
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback