Asus P7H55-M LX

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-M LX (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120618
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 22 '18 at 20:32
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 K 875-$180 2,354 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.25 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 95 1-Core 89.1 2-Core 178 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 439 47% 372 Pts	64-Core 435 27% 435 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% EVGA(3842 2888) 3GB CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Lighting 72.9 Reflection 69.4 Parallax 97.4 59% 79.9 fps	MRender 81 Gravity 82.2 Splatting 52.6 57% 71.9 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 216 219 221 223 216 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	78.5% Very good	Read 262 Write 246 Mixed 224 SusWrite 218 54% 238 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 71.3 4K Mixed 44.5 148% 50.2 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 197 147% 194 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 596GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 155 154 153 150 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Read 156 Write 136 Mixed 89.2 SusWrite 153 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 109%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 843GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 112 112 112 109 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 109 Write 102 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 111 73% 99.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	42.3% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 11.6 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 12.4 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 57 70% 57 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-M LX Builds (Compare 409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M LX

CPU
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	109x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	61x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	60x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	43x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	23x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	21x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	17x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	12x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	184x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	88x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $89

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16