EVGA 132-BL-E758

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	EVGA 132-BL-E758 (all builds)
Memory	7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110825
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 22 '18 at 17:18
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Socket 423, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 88.9 1-Core 83.9 2-Core 165 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 483 50% 402 Pts	64-Core 627 39% 627 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2400-XT 1,881 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 2190) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	0.67% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1.54 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.95 fps	MRender 0.95 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 1.26 1% 0.79 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.67% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 58 59 59 59 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.6% Below average	Read 120 Write 106 Mixed 109 SusWrite 57.9 22% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 30.5 4K Mixed 25.3 82% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 26.4 DQ Write 39.9 DQ Mixed 31.4 24% 32.6 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 129%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 97GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 54 55 55 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 71.7 Write 78.1 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 54.4 49% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 57%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 110 111 112 112 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Read 182 Write 148 Mixed 28.4 SusWrite 111 85% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 858GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 59 59 59 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 117 Write 102 Mixed 96.1 SusWrite 59.3 70% 93.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2TB free Firmware: MN6OA5C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 110 111 112 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 145 Write 145 Mixed 77.1 SusWrite 111 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 85%
Generic USB SD Reader 32GB 507 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 29GB free, PID 6362 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 18.8 Write 17.3 Mixed 17.8 SusWrite 17.3 24% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 3.4 232% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.9% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 15.1 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 9.9 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 132-BL-E758 Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: EVGA 132-BL-E758

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	69x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	13x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	12x
GeForce GTX 690 (SLI Disabled)NvidiaBench 40%, 5,438 samples	7x
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples	7x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	43x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	20x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16