MSI Z97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7918
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918)  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateAug 22 '18 at 02:05
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 53%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 55.2
1-Core 85
2-Core 167
57% 102 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 308
39% 296 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.7% Average
Lighting 61.4
Reflection 61
Parallax 39.3
50% 53.9 fps
MRender 61.7
Gravity 58.3
Splatting 51.6
46% 57.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 72 74 73 74 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.5% Average
Read 182
Write 117
Mixed 159
SusWrite 72
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 22
81% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 53.6
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 94.7
70% 89.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 75%
Ramsta S600 480GB
278GB free
Firmware: RS47V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 187 11 82 36 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 401
Write 356
Mixed 318
SusWrite 112
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 0.5
35% 9.97 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 13.5
DQ Mixed 0.6
15% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 93%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
872GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 89 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 88
Write 94.5
Mixed 39
SusWrite 89.2
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
64% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 67%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
28GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 5.6 4.9 5.7 5.7 5.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
5.95% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 11.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 7.5
14% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.2
61% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.95%
Great: 8%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
26GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 26 26 20 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
9.36% Terrible
Read 24.2
Write 12.3
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 23.5
23% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.9
42% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.36%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.2% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 12.9
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918) Builds (Compare 2,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918) - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $783
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback