Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7100-$70 79,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 70.2 2-Core 182 65% 113 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 290 35% 267 Pts	64-Core 236 15% 236 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) 153,031 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Intel(8086 5912) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	4.5% Terrible	Lighting 7.03 Reflection 9.62 Parallax 5.69 6% 7.45 fps	MRender 2.52 Gravity 6.23 Splatting 0 2% 2.92 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.5% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Tigo 120GB 120GB 211 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0327B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 25 27 25 23 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 453 Write 402 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 78.6 52% 238 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 12.9 4K Mixed 0.3 40% 11.5 MB/s	DQ Read 61.8 DQ Write 44.7 DQ Mixed 1 15% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 104%
SanDisk Cruzer Switch 16GB 3,032 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 7GB free, PID 5572 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.4 4.3 4.7 4.8 4.6 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 35 Write 4.5 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 4.9 13% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2.4 147% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GB 32,056 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.8% Below average	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 10.3 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 7.7 20% 6.97 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16