Asus X55C

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus X55C (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X55C
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130109
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '18 at 13:57
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3632QM 24,912 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 87.5 2-Core 166 65% 111 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 398 41% 330 Pts	64-Core 401 25% 401 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 14C7) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.87% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 5.62 Parallax 2.91 4% 4.26 fps	MRender 5.62 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 8.04 5% 5.34 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.87% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 87 89 89 92 97 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.4% Average	Read 227 Write 123 Mixed 174 SusWrite 92 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 43.7 4K Mixed 27.3 90% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 76.7 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 102 77% 101 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 75%
Multiple Card Reader 32GB 2,863 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 29GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 13 16 14 17 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 15 Mixed 21 SusWrite 14.6 26% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 2.7 169% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 070E S3A4G83-13G9PE1B00 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.4% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14.8 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 15.1 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 79.9 50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X55C Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X55C

CPU
Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples	64x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	18x
Pentium B980IntelBench 46%, 3,640 samples	9x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	64x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	24x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	9x

SSD
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	3x

RAM
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 26%, 5,316 samples	41x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GBElpidaBench 43%, 67 samples	3x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GBElpidaBench 43%, 107 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 5% - Terrible

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16