Acer Aspire TC-220

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-220  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-220
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 20 '18 at 06:03
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
45.5% Average
Memory 59.9
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 119
48% 81.2 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 176
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.1% Above average
Lighting 74
Reflection 75
Parallax 65.2
60% 71.4 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 68.9
57% 69.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
515GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 316 296 329 328 326 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 275
Write 291
Mixed 276
SusWrite 315
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 38.3
126% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 245
184% 245 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
565GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 133 135 135 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 126
Write 128
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 133
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 109%
SDHC Card 8GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 5.1 4.3 4.8 4.9 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Read 15
Write 1.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4.6
7% 6.58 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.34%
Great: 13%
ST332082 0A 320GB
289GB free, PID 0275
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 14.5
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 29.3
32% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.4% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 12.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-220 Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback