Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6140 110 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU1, 2 CPU, 36 cores, 64 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 53.2 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 189 61% 112 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 759 67% 569 Pts	64-Core 4232 262% 4232 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 80%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 11.5TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 46 41 47 40 39 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.2% Very poor	Read 23.3 Write 77.8 Mixed 20 SusWrite 38.2 29% 39.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.3 178% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 82%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 11.5TB 10.5TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 139 138 139 126 138 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	94.3% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 87.3 Mixed 69.8 SusWrite 138 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1 300% 2.77 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M386A8K40BM2-CTD 2x31.5GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 8 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	41.9% Average	MC Read 21 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 16.3 46% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 6.9 20% 6.83 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 129%

UFO

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 61381stBench 70%, 135 samples	5x
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41141stBench 63%, 670 samples	5x
CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 61481stBench 74%, 176 samples	2x

SSD
M450 500GBMSIBench 251%, 1,372 samples	4x
SSDPEKKA512G7 512GBIntelBench 123%, 53 samples	3x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	2x

RAM
X4B16QB4BLTDSO-E-BC1 8x16GBATPBench 90%, 5 samples	5x
M393A4K40CB2-CTD 8x31.9GBSamsungBench 108%, 73 samples	2x
HMA82GR7AFR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 39%, 106 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16