Asus A78M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A78M-A  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 19 '18 at 00:49
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 82.4
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 125
58% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 217
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 58.2
Parallax 82.4
57% 70.3 fps
MRender 58
Gravity 57.9
Splatting 74.3
53% 63.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 131 137 135 136 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 300
Write 156
Mixed 198
SusWrite 144
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 21.2
84% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 47.8
DQ Write 50.3
DQ Mixed 43.9
34% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 85%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 127 133 128 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 124
Write 119
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 129
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 84%
WD Elements 500GB
104GB free, PID 1023
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 31 33 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 30
Write 30.4
Mixed 24
SusWrite 32.4
40% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G ACR256X64D3U1333C9 KHX1600C10D3/8G ACR256X64D3U1333C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28% Poor
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 8.9
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9.7
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A78M-A Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A78M-A - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $192
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback