Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3710 12,685 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	24% Poor	Memory 36.7 1-Core 16.6 2-Core 30.3 19% 27.9 Pts	4-Core 67.6 8-Core 65.1 9% 66.3 Pts	64-Core 64.2 4% 64.2 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.79% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 3 Parallax 3.38 2% 2.9 fps	MRender 1.33 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 1.91 2% 1.89 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.79% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GMTS600 128GB 301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1225CH1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 153 182 167 209 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 419 Write 210 Mixed 231 SusWrite 162 57% 255 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 33.9 4K Mixed 25.7 83% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 95.7 DQ Write 82.2 DQ Mixed 88.6 66% 88.8 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 2x4GB 11,918 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.5% Very poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 7.6 21% 7.47 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 2.5 8% 2.7 GB/s	Latency 218 18% 218 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N3710IntelBench 25%, 12,685 samples	1x
Celeron N3160IntelBench 28%, 1,747 samples	1x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	2x

SSD
TS128GMTS600 128GBTranscendBench 71%, 301 samples	1x
MTS600 M.2 256GBTranscend $311Bench 80%, 210 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBHynixBench 40%, 7,517 samples	1x
2x4GBHynixBench 60%, 11,918 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16