HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Z400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory	18.6 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180305
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '18 at 22:19
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	ARE-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3690-$990 4,808 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 89.9 1-Core 88.9 2-Core 182 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 531 53% 430 Pts	64-Core 647 40% 647 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BB) CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.93 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 21.7 Reflection 17.5 Parallax 20.8 18% 20 fps	MRender 25.5 Gravity 22.4 Splatting 17.3 17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,148 Write 4,431 Mixed 4,154 950% 4,244 MB/s	4K Read 558 4K Write 338 4K Mixed 278 1,381% 391 MB/s	DQ Read 1,050 DQ Write 807 DQ Mixed 853 658% 903 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 453GB free Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 199 197 200 196 199 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.1% Good	Read 229 Write 224 Mixed 218 SusWrite 198 49% 217 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 38.9 128% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 35.9 DQ Write 88 DQ Mixed 49.1 41% 57.7 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 144GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 159 159 160 161 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Read 153 Write 117 Mixed 63 SusWrite 160 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 425GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 81 80 82 85 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 146 Write 104 Mixed 53.3 SusWrite 83.2 71% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 105%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 101 102 106 99 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 109 Write 121 Mixed 51 SusWrite 101 70% 95.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-CH9 ID:01 98 HP669238-071-HYC ID:80 AD HMT351U7EFR8C-PB 58GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.1% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 17.3 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 12 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	569x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	534x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	488x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	272x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	155x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	137x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	73x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	65x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16