Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateAug 17 '18 at 18:27
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 124
58% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 286
32% 251 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.33% Terrible
Lighting 8.43
Reflection 7.77
Parallax 9.03
7% 8.41 fps
MRender 8.71
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.91 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.33%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 268 265 240 254 264 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 408
Write 394
Mixed 304
SusWrite 266
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 43
141% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 42.1
DQ Write 96.5
DQ Mixed 54
46% 64.2 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 118%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
738GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 74 75 77 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
47% Average
Read 88.1
Write 91.1
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 75.2
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
249GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 114 114 115 114 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 105
Write 107
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 113
72% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 58 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 80.8
Write 49.5
Mixed 45.6
SusWrite 57.7
43% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMB2GE484CA5-13HC Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX RMB2GE484CA5-13HC 8GB
667, 800, 667 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.2% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 10.4
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.3
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback