Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateAug 17 '18 at 18:27
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD FX-6300-$68
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
44.8% Average
1-Core 73
2-Core 135
50% 104 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 321
36% 276 Pts
64-Core 316
21% 316 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
7.25% Terrible
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 28.9
7% 24.8 fps
MRender 18.3
Gravity 31
Splatting 24.6
8% 24.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.25%
Great: 8%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 268 265 240 254 264 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 408
Write 394
Mixed 304
SusWrite 266
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 43
141% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 42.1
DQ Write 96.5
DQ Mixed 54
46% 64.2 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 117%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
738GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 74 75 77 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
47% Average
Read 88.1
Write 91.1
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 75.2
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
249GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 114 114 115 114 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 105
Write 107
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 113
72% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 58 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 80.8
Write 49.5
Mixed 45.6
SusWrite 57.7
43% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown RMB2GE484CA5-13HC Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX RMB2GE484CA5-13HC 8GB
667, 800, 667 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.2% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 10.4
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.3
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 34%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,984 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $696
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback