| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-C R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180419 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 17 '18 at 12:12 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.7%
Very good
|
69% 122 Pts
|
55% 445 Pts
|
33% 527 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1500 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.8.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
19.4%
Very poor
|
0% 56.2 fps
|
57% 70.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSD 120GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 164 239 248 251 241 MB/s
|
85.7%
Excellent
|
73% 325 MB/s
|
145% 52.7 MB/s
|
178% 270 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
507GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 157 163 152 146 148 MB/s
|
92%
Outstanding
|
92% 127 MB/s
|
156% 1.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
96.9%
Outstanding
|
102% 35.8 GB/s
|
78% 27.3 GB/s
|
45% 89.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-C R2.0 Builds (Compare 266 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-C R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 33x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 25x |
| Ryzen 5 3400GAMD $101Bench 68%, 93,718 samples | 22x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 24x |
| Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 22x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 19x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $162 |