Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '18 at 15:06
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 175
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 336
44% 333 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1569 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 37.3
Parallax 34.1
34% 37.6 fps
MRender 40.5
Gravity 35.8
Splatting 35.4
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 382 380 387 182 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 358
Write 372
Mixed 299
SusWrite 282
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 32.2
112% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 325
248% 334 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
873GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 108 108 111 113 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 112
Write 102
Mixed 62
SusWrite 106
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 68%
SAMSUNG HM161HI 160GB
72GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 29 29 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.2% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 19.9
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 28
34% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.4
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $233
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback