To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160715
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 16 '18 at 11:47
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6750
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Memory 60.1
1-Core 21.4
2-Core 34.7
29% 38.7 Pts
4-Core 35.7
8-Core 35.4
5% 35.6 Pts
64-Core 36.2
2% 36.2 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 44%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$26
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 47 75 76 79 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 13.2
Write 17.9
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 58.9
20% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
27% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 1 slots used
1GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
7.51% Terrible
MC Read 1.6
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 1.4
5% 1.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 2.5
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.51%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback