Medion ERAZER X5301 G/C123

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion ERAZER X5301 G/C123  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-EM
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151120
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 16 '18 at 10:17
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 176
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 637
61% 504 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.1% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 107
Parallax 93.5
84% 101 fps
MRender 93
Gravity 94.8
Splatting 97.9
78% 95.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-00000 128GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT2101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 27 20 23 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 468
Write 45.5
Mixed 81
SusWrite 28.2
33% 156 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 19.5
81% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 18.7
DQ Mixed 41.8
42% 72.7 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 53%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
209GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 126 126 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 158
Write 152
Mixed 91
SusWrite 125
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 109%
Generic- Multi-Card 4GB
4GB free, PID 0158
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.5 5.4 5.4 5.5 5.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Read 10.2
Write 6.5
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 5.4
9% 7.15 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.5
84% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 9%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 16GB
9GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 6.3 7.3 6.1 6.2 7.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
7.95% Terrible
Read 21.8
Write 12.8
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 6.7
17% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 2.7
134% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.95%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ERAZER X5301 G/C123 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Medion ERAZER X5301 G/C123

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $274
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback