TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell OptiPlex 9010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemDell OptiPlex 9010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 9010  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '18 at 17:56
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 181
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 389
49% 374 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 73.5%
 Great: 75%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
EVGA(3842 6160)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2302 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63% Good
Lighting 76.9
Reflection 76
Parallax 70.2
63% 74.4 fps
MRender 83.6
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 77.7
64% 77.7 fps
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 63%
 Great: 56%
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
CLim: 836 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 3.97
4% 3.96 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 3.43
Splatting 5.43
4% 4.46 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 3.55%
 Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 331 208 101 52 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 493
Write 443
Mixed 387
SusWrite 186
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 30.9
108% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 148
165% 279 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 79.7%
 Great: 101%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
70GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 230 232 244 236 230 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69.9% Good
Read 255
Write 216
Mixed 233
SusWrite 232
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 35.5
118% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 194
146% 195 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 69.9%
 Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
49GB free
Firmware: 18.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 99 101 111 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 108
Write 105
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 104
72% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 60.9%
 Great: 69%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
410GB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 115 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 73.8
Write 96.2
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 115
120% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.5
191% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 51.4%
 Great: 57%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
635GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 28 28 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 23
Write 23.7
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 27.3
34% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
149% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 21.2%
 Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 14GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.2% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.5
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 42.2%
 Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical OptiPlex 9010 Builds (Compare 3,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9010

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples1,840x
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples770x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples674x
GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples469x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples360x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples359x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples161x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples82x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples56x
RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples95x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples88x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples72x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback