| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | MSI MS-7693 |
| Motherboard | MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693) (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20151221 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 14 '18 at 15:34 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.9%
Very good
|
64% 104 Pts
|
44% 352 Pts
|
28% 461 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28%
Poor
|
27% 36.4 fps
|
30% 37.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
643GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 113 130 139 142 140 MB/s
|
95.4%
Outstanding
|
114% 156 MB/s
|
296% 2.33 MB/s
| |
|
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
444GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 104 106 105 104 MB/s
|
62.4%
Good
|
75% 102 MB/s
|
185% 1.33 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
745GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 162 162 162 161 161 MB/s
|
109%
Outstanding
|
118% 161 MB/s
|
322% 2.63 MB/s
| |
|
|
43.7%
Average
|
43% 58.9 MB/s
|
111% 0.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.9%
Average
|
49% 17.2 GB/s
|
28% 9.9 GB/s
|
60% 67 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,301 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 960x |
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 410x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 264x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 166x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 149x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 140x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $289 |