Biostar X370GT5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar X370GT5 (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180417
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '18 at 02:45
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	74%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Memory 83.3 1-Core 126 2-Core 248 84% 152 Pts	4-Core 495 8-Core 741 77% 618 Pts	64-Core 1,025 63% 1,025 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 0501) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.7.1 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.2% Average	Lighting 60.6 Reflection 67.6 Parallax 88.7 49% 72.3 fps	MRender 65.3 Gravity 61.1 Splatting 54.7 49% 60.4 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU655 120GB 3,439 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 20GB free Firmware: V8X01b05 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 428 Write 377 Mixed 347 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 64.2 4K Mixed 31.7 110% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 184 140% 185 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 94%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 769GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 147 152 148 152 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 166 Mixed 112 SusWrite 150 112% 153 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 2x8GB 1,789 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3334 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	58.1% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 18.5 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 18.4 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370GT5 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 54%

Yacht

Motherboard: Biostar X370GT5

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	10x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	3x

GPU
RX Vega-56AMD $170Bench 78%, 92,053 samples	4x
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples	3x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	2x

SSD
CV3-8D128-11 SATA 128GBLiteonBench 67%, 3,445 samples	2x
WDS500G2B0C 500GBWDCBench 193%, 3,120 samples	2x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 80%, 8,730 samples	3x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	2x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $280

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16