PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Foxconn H67MP-S/-V/H67MP (all builds) |
Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110223 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 13 '18 at 19:37 |
Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
56.1%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
|
1.93%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.01E04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 14 21 15 24 MB/s
|
15.3%
Very poor
|
|||
WD WD2502ABYS-18B7A0 250GB
199GB free
Firmware: 02.03B04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 20 23 21 27 MB/s
|
10.7%
Very poor
|
|||
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 04.05G05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 97 101 97 99 MB/s
|
60.1%
Good
|
|||
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
399GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 97 101 97 99 MB/s
|
68.8%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 11x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 10x |
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 8x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 5x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 4x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 4x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 7x |
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples | 4x |
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $394 |