Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 12 '18 at 23:23
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 132
60% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 455
44% 361 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.3% Below average
Lighting 45.9
Reflection 43.8
Parallax 39.1
37% 43 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 35.6
31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2306RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 204 197 203 198 197 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 434
Write 224
Mixed 206
SusWrite 201
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 26.6
100% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 120
115% 183 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 91%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
664GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 122 124 125 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 162
Write 138
Mixed 126
SusWrite 125
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 85%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 28 29 30 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 26
Write 25.9
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 25.7
19% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
190% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 17.7
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 13.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback