| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz |
| Display | 1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150723 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 12 '18 at 20:21 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59%
Above average
|
52% 81.2 Pts
|
31% 250 Pts
|
21% 337 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Device(0000 0000) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.82
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
13.7%
Very poor
|
15% 14.4 fps
|
11% 13 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 197 206 189 190 204 MB/s
|
60.2%
Good
|
49% 219 MB/s
|
103% 32.7 MB/s
|
98% 137 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34
40GB free
Firmware: HP33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 101 97 96 96 MB/s
|
64.9%
Good
|
70% 95.2 MB/s
|
162% 1 MB/s
| |
|
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 64GB-$13
28GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
|
9.74%
Terrible
|
30% 22 MB/s
|
40% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 333 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
22.9%
Poor
|
20% 7.03 GB/s
|
19% 6.6 GB/s
|
52% 77.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 960GM-VGS3 FX Builds (Compare 214 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX - $59
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 81x |
| FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 26x |
| FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 13x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $193 |