Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9

Performance Results


Gaming 103% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 110% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 (all builds)
Memory	58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171228
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '18 at 02:52
Run Duration	266 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$455 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% , 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Memory 81.6 1-Core 127 2-Core 254 85% 154 Pts	4-Core 499 8-Core 902 84% 700 Pts	64-Core 1,732 107% 1,732 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	113% Outstanding	Lighting 149 Reflection 162 Parallax 146 122% 152 fps	MRender 123 Gravity 140 Splatting 126 106% 129 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 332GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1182 1272 1243 1264 1277 1293 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	280% Outstanding	Read 1,947 Write 1,552 Mixed 861 SusWrite 1,255 314% 1,404 MB/s	4K Read 41.2 4K Write 176 4K Mixed 64 238% 93.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,316 DQ Write 1,052 DQ Mixed 1062 828% 1,143 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 280% Great: 353%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 838GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 163 174 177 170 165 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 171 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 169 101% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 107%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 97 112 113 103 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 90.3 Write 115 Mixed 68.8 SusWrite 106 70% 95 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.1 41% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 100%
Hitachi HUS726040ALA610 4TB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3TB free Firmware: T962 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 175 179 183 168 183 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 185 Mixed 74 SusWrite 178 109% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 1 247% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 109%
Hitachi HUS726040ALA610 4TB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3TB free Firmware: T962 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 171 175 174 173 172 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 174 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 173 107% 147 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.4 194% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 109%
Hitachi HUS726040ALA610 4TB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2.5TB free Firmware: T962 SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 191 186 191 191 188 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 178 Mixed 82 SusWrite 189 113% 155 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.6 208% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 173 171 181 176 174 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 183 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 176 110% 151 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 457% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 109%
WD WD8001FFWX-68J1UN0 8TB 379 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 175 174 178 174 182 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 175 Mixed 78.7 SusWrite 177 112% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.6 217% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x8GB 4,255 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 33.3 MC Write 61.8 MC Mixed 35 124% 43.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 10 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 110%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 - $500

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $455Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	67x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	58x
Core i9-7920XIntel $250Bench 82%, 5,430 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	63x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	32x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	18x

SSD
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	21x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	14x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	10x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	60x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	27x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $1,579

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16