| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock A55M-HVS (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20121204 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 12 '18 at 02:04 |
| Run Duration | 106 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
49.1%
Average
|
47% 75 Pts
|
20% 149 Pts
|
9% 151 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.4
|
18.2%
Very poor
|
17% 25.2 fps
|
20% 23.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
724GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 85 90 88 91 90 MB/s
|
50%
Average
|
60% 81.8 MB/s
|
120% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Teikon TMT251U6DFP8C-H9EJ 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31.9%
Below average
|
32% 11.3 GB/s
|
19% 6.77 GB/s
|
42% 94.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A55M-HVS Builds (Compare 63 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A55M-HVS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples | 15x |
| A4-3300 APUAMD $90Bench 35%, 2,884 samples | 10x |
| A6-3670 APUAMDBench 46%, 2,400 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples | 16x |
| Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples | 9x |
| Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $121 |