Asus Commando

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus Commando  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081222
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 11 '18 at 08:22
Run Duration500 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$41
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
24.9% Poor
SC Int 71.8
SC Float 42.7
SC Mixed 51.2
44% 55.2 Pts
QC Int 139
QC Float 78.6
QC Mixed 102
24% 107 Pts
MC Int 123
MC Float 74
MC Mixed 103
15% 100 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 27%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 838B) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 60.1
Parallax 55.3
18% 58 fps
MRender 55.2
Gravity 122
Splatting 50.5
34% 75.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 25%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 30 46 53 47 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 42.3
Write 42.3
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 40
28% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
35% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 53%
WD WD10JUCT-63J6SY0 1TB
140GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 52 30 71 42 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 50.7
Write 52.5
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 53.2
34% 47 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 63%
ASMT 2115 250GB
12GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 24 25 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 25.5
Write 23.5
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 23.9
32% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 299%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
20.1% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.8
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 46%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Commando Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Commando

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $254
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $160SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback