Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120217
Uptime29.2 Days
Run DateAug 11 '18 at 03:08
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 164
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 313
40% 305 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50% Average
Lighting 60.9
Reflection 64.6
Parallax 61.6
50% 62.3 fps
MRender 72.5
Gravity 63.3
Splatting 53.7
51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 220 222 228 228 218 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 331
Write 225
Mixed 245
SusWrite 220
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 35.4
118% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 155
117% 158 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
206GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 106 106 107 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 108
Write 101
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 106
70% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
736GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 76 78 79 78 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 104
Write 105
Mixed 63
SusWrite 78.1
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-10666CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL9-2GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL9-2GBXL 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.3% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.1
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 Builds (Compare 1,479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $1,018
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback